Наш блог

Z-эффект и обратный Z-эффект после интрамедуллярных гвоздей при переломах вертельной бедренной кости

Целью интрамедуллярных стержней с двумя стягивающими винтами было увеличение фиксации кости и контроль ротации внутри головки бедренной кости., preventing cutoff and eventual fixation failure. In comparison to an intramedullary nail with a single lag screw, a two lag screw design offers comparable rigidity and stability and has a noticeably higher failure strength.

Z-effect and Reverse Z-effect

However, this implant design has resulted in the identification of a new failure pattern known as the Z-effect phenomenon (see picture below), which shows up as the head/neck fragment collapsing, causing the superior lag screw to protrude and the inferior lag screw to migrate lateral to the nail.

Z-effect after intramedullary nailing systems for trochanteric femur fractures 1

The opposite effect, migration of the superior lag screw laterally and the inferior lag screw medially, is described by the reversed Z-effect.

The reason behind the Z-effect

The following theories were put out to explain how the Z-effect developed:

1. Lateral buttress deficit.

2. Unstable medial cortex.

3.The femoral head’s continuous friction and axial loading in varus

4.The osteoporotic head

Ways to avoid Z-effects

Putting the inferior lag screw above the calcar of the femoral neck may be the best way to position the lag screws in the head to prevent Z-effects. This will improve bone anchoring and prevent screwcut-out.Using a dual lag screw intramedullary nail may be something surgeons want to avoid in cases of intertrochanteric hip fractures with significant medial cortical comminution.If a longer inferior screw was employed, the loads were more evenly distributed between the implant and the two cephalic screws in the bone.

Note:The copyright belongs to the original author and the magazine,posts are for learning and communication only.